Do you have a question for the project team? Let us know!

Please ask any questions you may have about the Tree Protection By-law Coverage Options and a member of the project team will get back to you. 

loader image
Forgot password?
Didn't receive confirmation?
Register Now
Seems like you are already registered, please provide the password. Forgot your password? Create a new one now.
  • Share What's the cost of administering the bylaw? And how will this bylaw differ from other municipalities that have failed? on Facebook Share What's the cost of administering the bylaw? And how will this bylaw differ from other municipalities that have failed? on Twitter Share What's the cost of administering the bylaw? And how will this bylaw differ from other municipalities that have failed? on Linkedin Email What's the cost of administering the bylaw? And how will this bylaw differ from other municipalities that have failed? link

    What's the cost of administering the bylaw? And how will this bylaw differ from other municipalities that have failed?

    Ben O'hern asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for your question!

    The resources required to implement an enhanced private tree by-law will largely be determined based on the property types/sizes and tree sizes the final by-law will apply to. These details are still under consideration, pending receipt of community feedback. 

    The ongoing development of this by-law will incorporate lessons learned from surrounding municipalities, while responding to local concerns and priorities.

  • Share Who pays for the Certified Arborist Report on private property? on Facebook Share Who pays for the Certified Arborist Report on private property? on Twitter Share Who pays for the Certified Arborist Report on private property? on Linkedin Email Who pays for the Certified Arborist Report on private property? link

    Who pays for the Certified Arborist Report on private property?

    Inquiring minds wants to know asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for your question!

    To assess trees on private property, the property owner would pay for the Certified Arborist.

  • Share Who will be responsible for trimming tree? Who will pay? Timeliness for this to be done? What type of trees would be included: ornamental, other? Often trees do need removal for various reasons. Will we be "stuck" with this tree? If we want to cut it down does it need to be a certain height before it is part of the by-law? If we agree to replace, can we get rid of it? on Facebook Share Who will be responsible for trimming tree? Who will pay? Timeliness for this to be done? What type of trees would be included: ornamental, other? Often trees do need removal for various reasons. Will we be "stuck" with this tree? If we want to cut it down does it need to be a certain height before it is part of the by-law? If we agree to replace, can we get rid of it? on Twitter Share Who will be responsible for trimming tree? Who will pay? Timeliness for this to be done? What type of trees would be included: ornamental, other? Often trees do need removal for various reasons. Will we be "stuck" with this tree? If we want to cut it down does it need to be a certain height before it is part of the by-law? If we agree to replace, can we get rid of it? on Linkedin Email Who will be responsible for trimming tree? Who will pay? Timeliness for this to be done? What type of trees would be included: ornamental, other? Often trees do need removal for various reasons. Will we be "stuck" with this tree? If we want to cut it down does it need to be a certain height before it is part of the by-law? If we agree to replace, can we get rid of it? link

    Who will be responsible for trimming tree? Who will pay? Timeliness for this to be done? What type of trees would be included: ornamental, other? Often trees do need removal for various reasons. Will we be "stuck" with this tree? If we want to cut it down does it need to be a certain height before it is part of the by-law? If we agree to replace, can we get rid of it?

    Inez Vickerman asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for your question!

    Property owners will still be responsible for maintaining (including trimming) trees on their property. All trees that are not invasive species (as defined under the Invasive Species Act) will be covered under this by-law. The size of tree that is currently being looked at for this by-law to apply to is 20cm DBH (we welcome community feedback on this tree size applicability).

    If a tree needs to be removed because it is dead, dying, diseased, infested, or presenting a hazard (as determined through a Certified Arborist Report), permit fees will not apply. If the tree intended for removal is healthy and non-hazardous, then a permit can be applied for that will include an option for a tree replacement plan.

  • Share Will this plan consist of property owners paying more even money to the city if they need to have a tree removed? I’m a tree and nature lover. Just don’t love “money grabs.” on Facebook Share Will this plan consist of property owners paying more even money to the city if they need to have a tree removed? I’m a tree and nature lover. Just don’t love “money grabs.” on Twitter Share Will this plan consist of property owners paying more even money to the city if they need to have a tree removed? I’m a tree and nature lover. Just don’t love “money grabs.” on Linkedin Email Will this plan consist of property owners paying more even money to the city if they need to have a tree removed? I’m a tree and nature lover. Just don’t love “money grabs.” link

    Will this plan consist of property owners paying more even money to the city if they need to have a tree removed? I’m a tree and nature lover. Just don’t love “money grabs.”

    Tree Lover and Property Owner asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for your question!

    Property owners will only be required to pay for a permit if the tree in question is healthy and non-hazardous. If the tree(s) intended for removal are dead, dying, diseased, infested, or presenting a hazard, there will be no permit fee requirements.

  • Share Why is it that 74% of our tree canopy is located on private property? Why hasn’t Brantford kept up with tree replacement and enhancement on city owned land on Facebook Share Why is it that 74% of our tree canopy is located on private property? Why hasn’t Brantford kept up with tree replacement and enhancement on city owned land on Twitter Share Why is it that 74% of our tree canopy is located on private property? Why hasn’t Brantford kept up with tree replacement and enhancement on city owned land on Linkedin Email Why is it that 74% of our tree canopy is located on private property? Why hasn’t Brantford kept up with tree replacement and enhancement on city owned land link

    Why is it that 74% of our tree canopy is located on private property? Why hasn’t Brantford kept up with tree replacement and enhancement on city owned land

    Mary Lou asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for your question!

    The total potential plantable area on City-owned and managed land is only 5.16 sq.km. Not all of this land is suited to the survival of planted trees, but even if it was, we can only increase our tree canopy to a maximum of 26.9% by planting exclusively on City-owned and managed land. 

    Overall there is just more space on private property than on City property. The City will continue annual tree planting and maintenance work to increase the portion of the tree canopy located on City-owned and managed properties.

  • Share I live on a cul-de-sac and there is an grassed island with 4 trees. The city sent a letter to all 9 residents on our street in the spring advising that the city intended to remove the trees and the island. my question is WHY. I contacted our city councillor, John Sless and he advised that the island would not be removed but I still wonder why the issue was ever considered to remove the 4 trees and the island. on Facebook Share I live on a cul-de-sac and there is an grassed island with 4 trees. The city sent a letter to all 9 residents on our street in the spring advising that the city intended to remove the trees and the island. my question is WHY. I contacted our city councillor, John Sless and he advised that the island would not be removed but I still wonder why the issue was ever considered to remove the 4 trees and the island. on Twitter Share I live on a cul-de-sac and there is an grassed island with 4 trees. The city sent a letter to all 9 residents on our street in the spring advising that the city intended to remove the trees and the island. my question is WHY. I contacted our city councillor, John Sless and he advised that the island would not be removed but I still wonder why the issue was ever considered to remove the 4 trees and the island. on Linkedin Email I live on a cul-de-sac and there is an grassed island with 4 trees. The city sent a letter to all 9 residents on our street in the spring advising that the city intended to remove the trees and the island. my question is WHY. I contacted our city councillor, John Sless and he advised that the island would not be removed but I still wonder why the issue was ever considered to remove the 4 trees and the island. link

    I live on a cul-de-sac and there is an grassed island with 4 trees. The city sent a letter to all 9 residents on our street in the spring advising that the city intended to remove the trees and the island. my question is WHY. I contacted our city councillor, John Sless and he advised that the island would not be removed but I still wonder why the issue was ever considered to remove the 4 trees and the island.

    Kennyr asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for your question!

    The removal of those traffic islands inclusive of the trees located on them) was pursued in response to ongoing maintenance costs, needs for accessible parking, and greater snow clearing efficiency. This required the removal of the traffic islands (inclusive of the trees located on them). In accordance with the City Tree Protection By-law, replacement trees are replanted whenever a healthy tree must be removed for the operation and maintenance of public infrastructure.

  • Share Why doesn't the tree bylaw apply to all properties? Why only privately owned property? on Facebook Share Why doesn't the tree bylaw apply to all properties? Why only privately owned property? on Twitter Share Why doesn't the tree bylaw apply to all properties? Why only privately owned property? on Linkedin Email Why doesn't the tree bylaw apply to all properties? Why only privately owned property? link

    Why doesn't the tree bylaw apply to all properties? Why only privately owned property?

    Chestnut asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for your question!

    Private Tree By-laws can apply to a range of privately owned and managed properties, including residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional properties. 

    Regarding protections for trees on City owned and managed properties, the City of Brantford already has a City Tree By-law that applies protections to these trees. For more information about what the City Tree By-law covers, please visit: https://www.brantford.ca/en/things-to-do/trees-and-forestry.aspx